Featured Sociopolitical Stories

Malaysians MUST NOT Forget 2010!!


The curtain for 2010 will fall soon. I can safely say that 2010 has not been an impressive year for Malaysia. Through it all, the trials, tribulations, tragedies, victories and challenges reiterate the importance of NOT falling by the wayside in our endeavor to strive for a better nation. I decided to select memorable events for each month of the year in this post to emphasize the fact that we HAVE to plod on to realize our dream for a better Malaysia.



January 2010

1. The year started with a blast - literally - when we were shocked by the bombing of the Metro Tabernacle Church in Desa Melawati and the hacking of the judiciary website over the Allah issue as reported HERE in The Star. My blog post HERE gives a list of the many international news portals that reported the events.

2. On 16th January, I wrote HERE about Home Ministry secretary- general Datuk Seri Mahmood Adam's announcement in an interview yesterday that:

Students who join the Civil Defence or Rela cadet corps in school may find themselvesexempted from National Service under a Home Ministry proposal.

The ministry is seeking to recruit some 60,000 students for the two uniformed corps which offermilitary-style training as part of co-curriculum activities for secondary schools.

The training provided by Rela and the Civil Defence is even tougher than National Service. These two corps are also uniformed groups. Read more AT THIS LINK.
What has happened since then? To date, there have been no further announcements. Another flip-flop episode?

3. Then there was the unforgettable announcement of a Tea Party hosted by our PM for his Facebook and Twi! tter fol lowers just after Information Communication and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim's statement that Malaysians, especially Muslims, must avoid being totally immersed in the internet culture, especially Facebook and Twitter. Read more HERE.

February 2010

1. Our Prime Minister's aide Datuk Nasir Safar made his famous statements as reported HERE andHERE on 2nd February.

2. On the same day, Tun Dr. Mahathir launched Perkasa Selangor in Ampang Jaya and made some head-turning statements. Unfortunately, the link to the report in TMI is broken but you can read my post on it HERE.

3. On 10th February, TMI carried an article on PERC's blistering report on Malaysia released at the end of January. The link is broken but you can read the article in MT HERE. PERC asserted that a group of elite minorities were dominating the national agenda to the extent that it was hurting Malaysias attractiveness to investors.

March 2010

1. There was the famous MCA elections in March and the soap operas that were featured. Read more HERE and HERE.

2. Mid-March saw the announcement by Deputy Finance Minister Chor Chee Heung that Malaysia will see a gradual reduction in its corporate and income tax rates once the proposed Goods and Services Tax (GST) is in place by mid-2011. More at THIS LINK.

April 2010

1. The problems plaguing the RM482 million Shah Alam Hospital HERE and also about the Kota Kinabalu General Hospital were reported HERE and HERE. My post on the issue can be accessedHERE.

2. Malaysiakini HERE reported that a top Utusan Malaysia editor has blamed Malaysiakini as the source of today's problems and described the online news portal's editor as a frustrated media person.

3. Former PKR lawmakers Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim and Kulim-Bandar Baharu MP Zulkifli Noordin. Information Minsiter Datuk Seri Rais! Yatim a nd Malaysian ambassador to the US, Datuk Seri Jamaluddin Jarjis followed our PM to Washington as part of the Malaysia-United States Caucus. Rais was deputising for Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Anifah Aman. I am sure we remember the disclosures that were revealed then. Read more HERE.

4. In mid-April, John Berthelsen of Asia Sentinel wrote his article about the submarine issue HEREand I also wrote one AT THIS LINK that generated an interesting debate.

5. The Hulu Selangor by-election was held in April and I am sure you need no reminders about the chain of events.

May 2010

1. The month began with an announcement HERE that press freedom in Malaysia was at an all time low.

2. Barry Wain's book "Malaysian Maverick" hit the newstands and the books literally flew off the shelves - an indication that many Malaysians want to know more about TDM.

3. On May 6th, pandemonium erupted in the Penang state legislative assembly today when opposition leader Azhar Ibrahim warned that there would be a repeat of the May 13 riots if the people lost confidence in the authorities. Read more HERE.

4. The second week of May saw much public debate over the sports betting issue. More HERE.

5. Don't forget Hishamuddin's statement that street crime in Malaysia was exaggerated by idle chatter of women while at the hairdressers as reported in The Malaysian Insider HERE.

6. Then there was the controversial double page advert about a certain lady HERE which, much later, was denied officially by that newspaper overseas.

7. Lee Weng Kiat of Malaysiakini reported HERE that RTM2 producer Chou Z Lam has been terminated from the TV station, following his damning allegations of political interference over popular current affairs programme 'Galeri Mandarin Nasional'.

8. Mid-May saw the DAP win the Sibu by-election.

9. Free Malaysia Today posted THIS! ARTICLE about how teachers may be required to sit for an exam to obtain their teaching licence to pursue their teaching profession just like doctors and lawyers, if the Education Ministry's proposal is accepted. My post on this topic can be accessed AT THIS LINK.

10. On 27th May 2010, Idris Jala gave a statement as reported in Malaysiakini HERE as to how Malaysia risks becoming the next Greece unless voters swallow subsidy cuts that will see the price of petrol, food, electricity and other staples rise. He also warned us as to how the nation could be bankrupt by 2019.

June 2010

1. This article HERE that the government is considering moving the Parliament to the Putrajaya administrative capital, a move which could cost up to RM800 million. You can also read more about it HERE.

2. Please read my post on Please Sir, We Don't Understand English about how news reporters and police involved in the investigation did not understand English and the meaning of sedition. That post generated 66 comments!

3. Azhar Ibrahim expressed his belief that the state Umno believes Barisan Nasional can win back the Penang government from Pakatan Rakyat in the next general election. He is confident that Umno in particular could win more than the current 11 seats it won in the 2008 general election because of grassroot strength and the return of many rural Malay and Indian voters to the BN fold.

4. World Cup Fever!!!

5. THIS ARTICLE revealed The new Istana Negara in Jalan Duta will now cost more than RM800 million, and not RM400 million as announced by the government in 2006.

6. Tourism Minister Ng Yen Yen in a written reply to Batu Gajah MP Fong Poh Kuan in Parliament as reported HERE by Malaysiakini reportedly spent RM35 MILLION on the Malaysian Pavilion at the Shanghai World Expo!!
7. The Malaysia Insider reported HERE that Malaysia reported a RM19.6 billion shortfall in its balance of payments partly due to an unusually high errors and omissions deficit of RM30.5 billion in the first quarter of this year.

Most alarming is the fact that this is the second consecutive quarter where Malaysia reported a shortfall in its balance of payments.

My post on this topic can be accessed AT THIS LINK.

8. UPSR and PMR to be abolished?

9. Friends of PR was launched in UK on June 21.

10. The missing jets returned!! Read more HERE.

July 2010 to September 2010 (am tired already so I am compressing everything)

1. Spain wins the World Cup!

2. 1st memorial for the late Teoh Beng Hock

3. Cyberspace was abuzz in mid-July with reports of how American socialite Paris Hilton was briefly held by police on the French island of Corsica after being caught with cannabis in her handbag according to police sources as reported in many websites. My post on this issue generated over 11 000 hits. Somehow, paparazzi styled topics always have high appeal.

4. Home Minister announced HERE that a special unit has been set up to look out for Internet postings that can ignite racial tension and cause disunity.

5. Malaysiakini reported HERE today that Pemandu unveiled ambitious plans to boost its economy by mobilising hundreds of billions of dollars of private investment, although questions remained over whether the money would materialise.

October to December 2010


1. Syed Hamid Albar made his famous statement HERE.

2. In The Star, Johor Baru Puteri Umno chief Azura Mohd Afandi urged the Information Ministry to curb television shows and commercials that could lead people astray from the right religious paths. She said, Horror films and commercials deemed too sexy ! for youn g viewers might lead to deviant teachings. For example, commercials on sanitary pads are openly shown on TV and this could influence the young to get involved in social ills, said Azura, urging the ministry to increase shows that teach good values and religious practices.

3. Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said HERE that history will be a must-pass subject in Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination from 2013 along with the Bahasa Malaysia subject for students to obtain the SPM certificate.

4. MCLM was launched in London.

I have not mentioned other incidents related to political parties such as the resignation of Datuk Ibrahim, the Ronnie Liu controversy, PKR elections etc etc because I have mentioned them in recent posts.

The above list is NOT exhaustive but a small sample of the horrible news that have hit our shores this year.

It is up to US to make our future better. With the next GE looming round the corner, remember Voter-Get-Voters' tag line:


EVERY VOTE COUNTS
It's NOW or NEVER
Vote for a BETTER Malaysia

Vote For A Government bent on eradicating Corruptions,Racism,Abuse of Human Rights, ISA, OSA
A Government of the People, by the People & for the People

It is up to US to make CHANGE happen in Malaysia. Together, we CAN!!

HAPPY NEW YEAR, FOLKS!! Drive safely wherever you may be.

courtesy of masterwordsmith-unplugged
See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

Getting Corruption Right

December 31, 2010

Friends and Fellow Malaysians, I wish to end this year (2010) with Jagdish Bhagwatis article on Getting Corruption Right. It is my New Year fervent hope that our Government deals firmly with the corrupt in our country. In 2011, we will see two senior politicians, Tun Ling Leong Sik, and Khir Toyo in our courts. More can be expected given the fact that the new year is likely to be an Election Year (both National and Sarawak state elections).

Political temperatures will rise, but I am confident that as a nation of mature and intelligent Malaysians, we will be able to stay sensible, rational, and responsible as we debate issues and discuss the future of our wonderful country, warts and all. Din Merican

Getting Corruption Right

by Jagdish Bhagwati (December 29, 2010)

NEW YORK I just returned from India, where I was lecturing to the Indian Parliament in the same hall where US President Barack Obama had recently spoken. The country was racked by scandal. A gigantic, ministerial-level scam in the mobile-telephone sector had siphoned off many billions of dollars to a corrupt politician.

But several of the MPs had also been taken aback on discovering that when Obama spoke to them, he read from an invisible teleprompter. This had misled his audience into thinking that he was speaking extemporaneously, a skill that is highly regarded in India.

Both episodes were seen as a form of corruption: one involved money, the other deception. The two transgressions are obviously not equal in moral turpitude. But the Obama episode illustrates an important cross-cultural difference in assessing how ! corrupt a society is.

Transparency International and occasionally the World Bank like to rank countries by their degree of corruption, with the media then ceaselessly citing where each country stands. But cultural differences between countries undermine the legitimacy of such rankings which are, after all, based on surveys of the public. What Obama was doing was a common enough practice in the United States (though one might expect better from an orator of his ability); it was not so in India, where such a technique is, indeed, regarded as reprehensible.

India certainly has corruption, like almost every other country. But India also has a culture in which people commonly assume that everyone in public life is corrupt unless they prove otherwise. Even a blind man will tell Transparency International: I saw him take a bribe with my own eyes. Indeed, a distinguished Indian bureaucrat, a man of unimpeachable character, once told me that his mother had told him: I believe you are not corrupt only because you are my son!

So, if you ask Indians whether their governance is marked by widespread corruption, they will answer with gusto: yes! But their exuberance biases Indias global ranking relative to more empirically minded countries.

A similar bias arises from the occasional tendency to view political patronage elsewhere as being more corrupt than the same practices at home. For example, when the East Asian financial crisis broke out, there followed a systematic attempt to pin the blame on the affected countries: crony capitalism allegedly had somehow crippled their economies! In other words, the acquaintances and benefactors of the East Asian leaders were cronies, whereas those of US leaders were friends?

In fact, it was clear that the culprits were the International Monetary Fund and the US Treasury, which had encouraged a shift to capital-account convertibility without understanding that the case for free capital flows was not symmetrical with the case for free! trade.< /p>

But where substantial corruption can unambiguously be found, as it often can, one must recognize that it is not a cultural given. On the contrary, often it is the result of policies that have fed it.

India in the 1950s had a civil service, and a political class, that were the envy of the world. If that seems shocking today, the loss of virtue must be traced to the all-pervasive permit raj, with its licensing requirements to import, produce, and invest, which grew to gargantuan proportions. High-level bureaucrats quickly discovered that licenses could be bartered for favors, while politicians saw in the system the means to help important financial backers.

Once the system had taken root, corruption percolated downward, from senior bureaucrats and politicians, who could be bribed do what they were not supposed to do, to lower-level bureaucrats, who would not do what there were supposed to do unless bribed. Clerks would not bring out files, or get you your birth certificate or land title, unless you greased their palms.

But if policies can create corruption, it is equally true that the cost of corruption will vary with the specific policies. The cost of corruption has been particularly high in India and Indonesia, where policies created monopolies that earned scarcity rents, which were then allocated to officials family members.

Such rent-creating corruption is quite expensive and corrosive of growth. By contrast, in China, the corruption has largely been of the profit-sharing variety, whereby family members are given a stake in the enterprise so that their earnings increase as profits increase a type of corruption that promotes growth.

In the long run, of course, both types of corruption are corrosive of the respect and trust that good governance requires, which can undermine economic performance in its own right. B! ut that does not absolve us of the responsibility to define corruption properly and to acknowledge obvious and important cultural differences in how it is understood.

Jagdish Bhagwati, Professor of Economics and Law at Columbia University and Senior Fellow in International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations, is the author of Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Trade Agreements Undermine Free Trade.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010.
www.project-syndicate.org



See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

No problem with Teos attire, says mosque

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 31 A Masjid Taman Cheras Jaya official said today it had no problem with how Teo Nie Ching was dressed during an aerobics exercise programme recently in the mosques car park, even as Umno stepped up criticisms against the DAP MP for her tight-fitting clothes.

The Serdang MP(picture) was photographed recently in a T-shirt and track pants while taking part in the aerobics session, and this was seized on by the Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia to accuse her of violating the sanctity of the mosque for wearing allegedly tight-fitting clothes and not covering her aurat.

We do not have any problem at all with YB Teos attire, Masjid Taman Cheras Jaya committee chairman Azman Idris told The Malaysian Insider today.

Covering the aurat is applicable only to Muslims. So, the issue of covering the aurat is not applicable to YB Teo, he added.

The Malay daily published a front-page story yesterday with the headline Teo Nie Ching makes trouble again along with a picture of her exercising with men and women at Masjid Taman Cheras Jaya during a recent Maal Hijrah carnival.

Today, an Utusan Malaysia column said females were required to wear clothes which covered their aurat, and not shorts or sexy clothes.

Azman, however, claimed that the issue of covering the aurat in a mosque was not explicitly defined in Islamic teachings.

When it comes to the mosque, it is called an in-house regulation, said Azman.

We also did this (exercise) activity in the car park area, not in the mosque. I dont see any issue, he added.

Azman also pointed out that some Muslim women, who had attended the Maal Hijrah carnival on December 12, did not cover their aurat.

Some of them wore tight jeans. But we have no problem, he said.

We put up a signboard saying, please cover your aurat. But we cannot enforce it as it is an individual respo! nsibilit y. We can only encourage, he added.

Yesterday, the first-term parliamentarian told The Malaysian Insider that she would continue attending functions in mosques if invited, despite Utusan Malaysias renewed attacks.

In August, Teo was criticised by Barisan Nasional (BN) politicians and conservative Muslim groups over her controversial surau visit after Utusan Malaysia published a front-page picture of her addressing those who were praying at the Al-Huda surau in Kajang Sentral.

She was lambasted for entering the surau with her hair uncovered.

Women are required to cover their hair when entering a mosque.

Azman, however, said such requirements were not stated in Islamic teaching.

About non-Muslims coming to the mosques and being required to wear the tudung, that is only an internal regulation, he said.

Nothing in Islamic teaching states that it is compulsory, he added.

Utusan Malaysia quoted the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) today as saying that Teos tight dressing was tantamount to insulting the Selangor Sultan.

The Malay daily claimed that Teo had ignored the Sultans previous rebuke of her surau visit in August.

Teos controversial surau visit had allegedly displeased the Selangor Sultan and sparked a warning from Mais, who barred her from entering the prayer areas of any suraus or mosques in Selangor without its permission.

However, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders, including PAS spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat, had defended Teo over her surau visit. - Malaysian Insider


See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

Selangors 1-Depair Scenario

December 31, 2010

1-Despair Scenario

by Tunku Abdul Aziz @ Sin Chew Daily

The banning of the 1Malaysia logo is an act of mindlessness. It is an exercise in absurdity of the kind becoming all too common in Malaysian politics.

The real Idiot is in the Red

The decision to proscribe the display of the 1Malaysia logo within the jurisdiction of the state of Selangor is childish to say the least, and that is putting it as charitably as I can. It reflects particularly badly on the maturity of the Pakatan Rakyat state government of Selangor.

It was clearly a decision made without reference to the top Pakatan Rakyat national leadership whom I know would not have countenanced such action.

This one rash, potentially suicidal, political decision is bound to reinforce, and lend credence to, the growing conviction among many Malaysians that some Pakatan Rakyat politicians are totally incapable of shaking off their doctrinaire attitudes, including that of opposing anything and everything for its own sake. Even as they now don the mantle of the ruling elite in the Pakatan Rakyat governed states, they continue to behave in much the same way as they used to under less favourable circumstances.

The logical question to ask is whether the Pakatan Rakyat, with its politically imbecilic camp followers in tow, could really be trusted to do a proper job of taking on a bigger and more demanding show that of administering the Government of Malaysia.

On current showing, I should be less than honest if I did not say that they would have to be more savvy and sensible before they would get my vote of confidence. I should be careless in the extreme if I did not consider hedging my bets. The Pakatan Rakyat leaders have their job cut out for them like knocking a modicum of common sense into some ! of their colleagues in the Selangor state executive council.

There is, to me, nothing fundamentally wrong with the express aim of 1Malaysia. Surely it is not a bad thing to want to unite all Malaysians. My quarrel with 1Malaysia, as articulated by Najib, with or without APCOs hidden hand, is in its shallow, barely scratching the surface superficiality. It lacks focus, with the result that its true potential for serving the public good has been severely crimped, making 1Malaysia sound like one gigantic con job.

Najib would do well to remember, before throwing more good millions after bad, that the first syllable of the word consultant including APCO, is CON. But I digress. I am on record as being a fierce critic of 1Malaysia but I have not allowed my personal distaste for Najibs cheap, hollow slogan to turn me into a foaming at the mouth, saliva dripping, bulging eyed, raving demagogue.

There are surely more important issues that the Pakatan Rakyat politicians can think of doing for the benefit of the people of Selangor. Instead they chose to fall over themselves to indulge in petty, immature grandstanding. The timing could not have been worse.

Their supporters and sympathisers, who had hoped for more sober and responsible behaviour after the very ugly public exhibition of unremitting internal squabbles in the recent PKR leadership elections, were, in the event, enormously disappointed.

While the crusade against the display of the 1Malaysia logo in Selangor is being justified on the ground that it is all part of the BN political propaganda, a message has arrived, via my mobile, as if on cue, as follows: DAP cannot have double standards. The bylaws should apply to ALL.

The sender alludes to the fact that DAP has used its party logo to publicise its Rocket Cafe in Petaling Jaya. Why, asks the gentleman, was no action taken by the local council? A fair point that requires an official response in the interest of transparency and accountability.

Pakatan Rakyat politicians have! no busi ness to claim the moral high ground and portray themselves as ethically and morally superior if they do not renounce hypocrisy and act strictly in accordance with the high ethical standards of behaviour expected of them by their supporters.

Putrajaya is many things to many people, but it is more than a shiny political trophy to be won by hook or by crook.

On balance, I daresay BN has made a reasonable go of it given the internal weaknesses inherent in a system of patronage with its infernal attendant preoccupation with rent seeking and cronyism. That system is set in a solid bed of unbridled corruption.

I understand the Pakatan Rakyat has its demolition team in the wings ready to smash the very foundation of corruption in our society. The Pakatan Rakyat has every right to set its sights on that glittering prize, but it first has to review and change, as appropriate, its whole range of attitudes before it can change Malaysia for the better. Otherwise Putrajaya will be a destination too far. It will merely be aspirational, a gleam in the eye, and a forlorn dream.

Lim Kit Siangs one-term wonder should be taken to heart and reflected upon. It is a sobering thought and the best advice there is for the Pakatan Rakyat to act on.


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

The government chief secretary is "kurang ajar"

The recent announcement made by the BN federal government's chief secretary Tan Sri Sidek Hassan to appoint the tainted Selangor religious department director Mohd Khusrin Munawi to take over the position of Selangor state secretary without informing the Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim has been unbecoming and Tan Sri Sidek has been seen as rude.
The rudeness of Tan Sri Sidek is, he did not even have the care or courtesy to consult the Selangor Menteri Besar on the state secretary's choice, instead choose to bypass Khalid and went straight to the Sultan of Selangor to present the appointment.
Yes, we know the state secretary's position is under the jurisdiction of the Public Service Department (JPA), but as that position is a state based, the chief secretary should have at least demonstrate his proper manners and professionalism in getting the Selangor Menteri Besar's acknowledging the appointment first. Again we wish to point that Tan Sri Sidek is being rude and unprofessional in discharging his duties and responsibilities.
See! What have the chief secretary Tan Sri Sidek Hassan caused? He purposely bypassed the Menteri Besar and appointed his own candidate for the state secretary's position while the Selangor state government is still in process of identifying the most suitable candidate through proper channel and procedures.
Or perhaps, if Tan Sri Sidek says it is not his fault, then who instructed him to create all these chaos in Selangor? Is the prime minister who is also the Umno president Datuk Najib Razak pulling the strings from behind? We are sure that Najib would soon come out to push the blame back to Tan Sri Sidek by saying that the appointment was with JPA and not him. In the end Najib would just wash his hands and pass the buck back to Tan Sri Sidek.
So, Tan Sri Sidek, what do you have to say for now? You had definitely sabotaged and indeed jeo! pardized the relationship between the state and federal governments with your rudeness and being unprofessional in your duties.
Well, you had already shown your great powers to step on the Menteri Besar's head. You helped the Umno president by acting on his behalf and now you have to take ownership of the "kurang ajar" title.
By the way, are you going to do the same on Kedah, Penang and Kelantan states as well?Written by Viktor Wong

See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

Selangor row heading for constitutional impasse

Karpal has been asked to help on behalf of the MB. File picKUALA LUMPUR, Dec 31 The controversial appointment of Datuk Mohd Khusrin Munawi as the Selangor state secretary may lead to a constitutional crisis if the Selangor Sultan carries out a planned swearing-in ceremony for the post on January 6.

Constitutional experts argued today that the ceremony, scheduled for next Thursday, was unlawful as the state constitution dictates that the oath of office has to be done in front of the Selangor mentri besar, and not the Selangor Sultan.

The Selangor government has insisted it has the final say in deciding the state secretary, after the Selangor Sultan agreed with Putrajaya to appoint Mohd Khusrin as state secretary despite Khalid having his own list of names for the top civil service post in the countrys wealthiest state.

It is understood however that outgoing state secretary Datuk Ramli Mahmuds official oath of office was done in the presence of Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah back in March 2006, during the previous Barisan Nasional (BN) Selangor government.

The Sultan has to seek legal advice from the state legal adviser before proceeding with this ceremony. On a matter like this, the Sultan acts on executive advice, His Highness cannot do it on his own. The concern is that if the ceremony is carried out, it can be declared null and void by a court of law. This is unconstitutional, as it is not within the provisions of the state constitution. The state constitution does not allow for this.

It could lead into a constitutional crisis because it is not in line with the state constitution... but I hope this does not happen, that is why the Sultan must be extra careful before going through with this, Karpal Singh told The Malaysian Insider.

The veteran lawyer revealed that he had been asked by Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim to look into the legal aspects of the ma! tter per sonally.

I am actually looking at the laws right now... I have been asked to help on behalf of the MB, said the DAP lawmaker.

The act of the Sultan can be taken up in a court of law, added Karpal.

Article 52 (4) of the Selangor state constitution stipulates that the state secretary shall take and subscribe in the presence of the Mentri Besar the following oath of secrecy. There is no mention that the state secretarys oath of office has to be done in the presence of the Sultan.

Aziz claimed that the swearing-in ceremony in front of the Selangor Sultan was a new practice. File picConstitutional expert Prof A. Aziz Bari claimed that the swearing-in ceremony of the state secretary in front of the Selangor Sultan was a new practice, saying that he was not aware that such a ceremony existed.

As far as I know this is the first time such a ceremony is being held, even though I feel that it is only an official function and such a ceremony is not needed, he toldThe Malaysian Insider.

The law expert echoed Karpals stand on the matter, saying that there was nothing in the state constitution which supported the basis for the planned ceremony.

I dont think this logic can be used, it is like a state assembly Speaker not having the power to take action against state lawmakers but the Parliament Speaker being able to do otherwise, said Aziz.

The political secretary to the Selangor MB, Faekah Husin, confirmed today that the MBs office received invitation letters for the January 6 ceremony three days ago.

Khalid has himself indicated that he will not accept Mohd Khusrin as Selangors new state secretary.

During a solat hajat function last night at his residence in Shah Alam, the Selangor MB had stressed that he still had the option to not accept Mohd Khusrin by not agreeing to him taking the oath of secrecy.

If Mohd Khusrin does not take the oath of secrecy in ! front of the MB, then he cannot perform his duties as state secretary fully. He cannot attend state exco meetings or be privy to state secrets. Sure he will be state secretary in name but not by duty. MB is implying that this is the option Selangor has, to not allow the state secretary to angkat sumpah (take the oath), Khalid Samad told The Malaysian Insider.

The Shah Alam MP was among those present during Khalids function last night, where the Selangor MB made his first public statement on the matter.

The Chief Secretary to the Government announced on Monday Mohd Khusrins promotion to replace Ramli, who leaves on December 31. - Malaysian Insider


See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

Balanced worldview via history

Brave New World (The Star)
30 December 2010

Our secondary school history syllabus needs some serious thought and reworking as it is very imbalanced.

_________

I DID a funny thing on Christmas Day. I went to a bookstore and bought an SPM history book. The last time I read one of these things, Ronald Reagan was president and it was considered the height of fashion to wear carrot-cut trousers and white socks with your little black shoes; an ugly time indeed.
Anyway, the reason I bought this SPM history textbook was because there has been some controversy recently about the proposal to make history a compulsory subject in the SPM exams.
The main contention about this move by the Government is the actual content of the history taught. In the spirit of independent research, I bought the book to see if there is any cause for concern.
The thing about history is that it is not written in stone. Discoveries are made which shed new light on old ideas. For example, archaeological digs in Malaysia have shown that the peninsular has been inhabited for far longer than previously thought.
In Egypt, discoveries of entire towns surrounding the great pyramids suggest that they were built by a skilled workforce as opposed to an army of slaves (or technologically advanced Atlanteans if you read some of the more far out books).
Even existing facts can be reinterpreted in order to view established historical figures and events in a new way.
Recent works on Genghis Khan dismiss the simplistic (and racist) view that he was merely a blood-thirsty conqueror. Instead his empire established progressive ideas such as a common currency, protected trade routes and centres for education and culture.
However, the interpretation and reinterpretation of history has to be done very carefully.
There is always the danger that if a person has a specific agenda in mind, then his version of historical events can be very skewed and untruthful.
For example, for many years the great African civilis! ations l ike Nubia were not given any prominence because it conflicted with the European agenda to depict Africa as a backward place, thus justifying their exploitation of the continent and its peoples.
Therefore, any historian worth his salt must be as objective as possible and back his assertions with solid evidence; assertions which can change with future discoveries.
With this in mind, I dipped into my brand new book. And I must admit that the SPM syllabus leaves much to be desired.
The most glaring oddity is found in the Fourth Form section of the book. There are 10 chapters in the Fourth Form syllabus and five of them are about Islamic civilisation.
I do not understand why there has to be so much emphasis on Islamic civilisation.
Great swathes of important history such as the ancient Greeks, the Roman Empire, the Chinese Kingdom, the Indian empires (north and south), the Renaissance and the South-East Asian kingdoms are dealt with almost perfunctorily.
What is even more troubling is that the history of Islamic civilisation has elements of theology in it.
This overly heavy emphasis on one aspect of human history is not healthy as it provides our young people with a very imbalanced worldview.
And it is most ironic that it is Islamic civilisation that is given so much space in the history syllabus because one of the greatest strengths of the so-called golden age of Islamic history was the hunger that Muslim thinkers then had to seek knowledge from around the world.
They were not insular and narrow in their thinking and if one were to truly honour Islamic civilisation, then it is this attitude that should be embraced, not the rather strange idea that one civilisation deserves so much more attention than all others.
Looking at the Fifth Form part of the book, there is also some cause for concern.
In studying the development of the nation state that is Malaysia, there is a need for our young people to understand that there were many players involved.
The Malayan Union, for exam! ple, was not opposed by the Malays only. The multi-racial AMCJA-PUTERA (which was given approximately three dismissive lines in the book I bought), opposed the Malayan Union too.
They organised massive rallies and a general strike which Malayans from all walks of life and ethnic communities participated in. And they were the first to actually demand independence.
So yes, I do believe that our secondary history syllabus needs some serious thought and reworking. As it is, it is very imbalanced.
If taught correctly, history can be fun and also invaluable in shaping a sense of common identity.
However, if taught wrongly it is deadly dull and if content-wise it is wrong, it can be divisive and breed dangerous ideology.
With the New Year upon us, let us not forget that to move forward we must understand the past.
Let that understanding be a fair one in order for our progress to be fair too.
See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

MACC Panel Advisor Robert Phang calls A-G Gani Patail a Rogue


December 31, 2010

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL MALAYSIANS AND PEOPLE OF PEACE AND GOODWILL THE WORLD OVER. LET US WELCOME 2011 WITH HOPE AND ANTICIPATION

MACC Panel Advisor Robert Phang calls A-G Gani Patail a Rogue

by Din Merican

In his New Year Resolution Wish for all Malaysians, Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin, Panel Advisor, Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) sent a sobering message to our Prime Minster, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and his government. He asked our Prime Minister to handle firmly IKIM, PERKASA and Attorney-General Gani Patail.

Phang launched a veiled yet blistering attack against these three destructive elements that threaten unity, truth and justice in our country. While many perceived IKIMs statement on Santa Claus to be irrational, religious intolerance towards other faiths became more apparent when Prime Minister Najibs aides directed church officials to remove crucifixes and other overt Christian symbols from being displayed at the Catholic Archbishops Christmas tea party at Bukit Nanas, Kuala Lumpur which was attended by PM Najib. The whole objective of the PMs presence to show unity and promote racial harmony, and religious tolerance (1Malaysia) was immediately erased.

Tan Sri Robert Phang

In the same press statement which was posted by Malaysia Today,Phang also took a swipe at A-G Gani Patail. Referring to a statement, made only a few days ago, by YB Salahudin Ayob, Vice President of PAS, that Gani Patail is a Bajingan dalam Kerajaan, the crusader Tan Sri also called AG Gani Patail a rogue element in government and questioned the A-Gs exercise of his prosecutorial powers which sm! acks of selective prosecution bordering on persecution. He said that it is frightening that the whole machinery of the A-Gs office and the MACC can be used against an innocent citizen in relation to the A-Gs treatment of Lawyer Rosli Dahlan.

Lawyer Rosli Dahlan isolated and left in the cold

I praise Phang for his press statement. It is an inspiring and brave statement. It is refreshing when someone within the establishment, like Phang, dares to criticise what is wrong within the government. He makes it clear that his membership in the MACC Panel is not just to be a rubber stamp. If there is one Tan Sri who has earned that honorific title, it has to be Phang.

Thus, the best I can do is to reproduce his Press Statement below. Thank you,Tan Sri Robert Phang and my best wishes to you for 2011. Our campaign for justice and national unity is far from over. In fact, it has just begun and the journey ahead is arduous and full of risks for all civil activists.

_____________________

December 29, 2010

Press Statement by Tan Sri Datuk Robert Phang Miow Sin.
Justice of Peace
Chairman Social Care Foundation
Panel Advisor, Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)

Make Unity, Truth and Justice as New Year Resolutions for Malaysians

On Friday December 31, 2010, we will say goodbye to 2010 and usher in 2011. Fortune tellers, astrologers and Feng Shui practitioners will review the events of past years in self glorification of the accuracy of their predictions. Th! ey will attempt to provide new prophecies and guidance to forecast events and good fortunes for the coming year. But, they do it for commercial gains.

2. As a social activist, I would like to address the fundamentals that are of importance to us as a progressive nation. Malaysia is a country of faiths. It is stated that Islam is the official Religion of the Federation but at the same time, freedom to practise other faiths and religions is guaranteed. How we prosper as a nation cannot be based on fortune telling and guessing games, but on hard facts, sound policies and universal principles to be gathered from our faiths and religions.

3. Whether we are Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists or of any other faith, the plurality of faiths of this country must be preserved. I call on IKIM and PERKASA not to cause confusion by fanning the differences between us, but to build on the commonality that binds us. Its a folly to claim whose religion or whose god is the right one. All religions teach good things and we all believe in ONE TRUE GOD.

Respect the Dignity of Difference as Diversity is our Strength

4. Thus, all talk that cause differences, tensions and schisms must stop. If May 13, 1969, is to be remembered, it should be commemorated as a day of mourning when this multi-cultural and multi-religious beloved country of ours was almost ruined. Thus, it must be our national resolution that May 13 must not recur or Malaysia will become a failed state. It is our commonality that binds us as a nation since Independence and that will shape our future destiny as 1Malaysians!

5. With regard to the New Key Result Areas (NKRAs) for reduction of crimes, I congratulate Home Minister Dato Seri Hishamuddin Tun Hussein Onn, who has worked hard and developed innovative wa! ys to as sist the PDRM in the fight against crime. I also congratulate Dato Seri Hishammudin for understanding the importance of public perception and thus ended the former IGPs tenure. Compared to his predecessor, Tan Sri Ismail Omar is a breath of fresh air. Like a clean white sheet, it is now in his hands to re-shape PDRM (Royal Malaysian Police) into the principal respected law enforcement agency that it once was. We, Malaysians, must support Tan Sri Ismail Omar, the current IGP, to aspire for a crime free society.

6. As a Panel Advisor of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), I applaud the achievements of the MACCs Chief Commissioner, Dato Seri Abu Kassim, in bringing to book some big names this year. In the PKFZ case, Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik has been charged. However, the report by the forensic auditors mentioned several other big names, including those still serving in government and are also big names in their political party. These big names have quickly used the MACCs clearance as a political mileage. This has invited public skepticism, especially when it is perceived that a thorough investigation has not been conducted and the clearance was just a political whitewash. That was what the public perceived in the case of former Selangor MB Dato Seri Dr Khir Toyo until he was charged recently. I remind these big names not to be so gleeful, bordering on arrogance.

7. The public also view with grave suspicion the allegations over the personal conduct of Attorney-General (A-G) Tan Sri Gani Patail who is seen consorting with Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramlis proxy, Shahidan Shafiee. This is of great disservice to the government in the fight against corruption. I have raised this before and the A-Gs continued silence is deafening. PAS vice president Salahuddin Ayob has now raised the same issue. This is not just a political issue but it also concerns the integrity of the highest law officer of the country. His actions and conduct can erode the credibility of the government.

8. T! here is also public skepticism over the conduct of the A-G, in the exercise of his prosecutorial powers. His reluctance to act in certain cases, while very vociferous in others, have given rise to allegations of selective prosecution bordering on persecution. YB Salahudin Ayob also raised this seeming double standards involving the case of lawyer En Rosli Dahlan. En Rosli is widely known to be the lawyer handling the MAS case and has alleged that he had been victimised by rogue elements in the government. It is frightening to the citizens at large that the whole machinery of the A-Gs office and the MACC can be used against one man. The government must dispel this perception of persecution against an innocent citizen.

9. I have raised these matters without any personal or political agenda. I am not a politician. I speak for what I believe to be true and right. These are matters that have been in the public domain and it is incumbent on me to remind the powers that be of the public displeasure. Only in this way civil activists like me can be of service to the nation, the government and the public. This is consistent with the reminder by the Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak that those in power must not suffer from the four diseases Delusion, Amnesia, Inertia and Arrogance.

10. In closing 2010s chapter and in welcoming 2011, I pray for Gods Blessings upon all of us and that we become a truly 1Malaysia nation in the pursuit for Unity, Truth And Justice. I wish all Malaysians a Happy and Blessed New Year!

HUMBLENESS IS GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL, THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD.

Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin

Justice of Peace

I also reproduce an international news article about the sham trial of former Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky seen by many democratic nations of the world as a test of the rule of law in Russia. I! t is som ething for us in Malaysia to remember that we will still be regarded as a pariah state regardless of our economic success. PM Najib should take note of all these if he is intending to call GE 13 next year. He should remove all the rogue elements in his government! Win the confidence of Malaysians and make history.

_____________

Khodorkovsky lawyer blames Putin for client sentence6 more Years in the Slammer

December 30, 2010

Freedom is a Universal Right

A man holds a portrait of Mikhail Khodorkovsky at a picket in support of the former oil tycoon near the court building in Moscow today, December 30, 2010. Russia accused the United States and Europe of trying to influence the trial of Khodorkovsky, calling such efforts unacceptable and warning the West to mind its own business.

MOSCOW, December 30 The lawyer of jailed former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky today blamed Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin for his clients sentence of six more years in prison in a court case seen by some Western nations as a test of the rule of law in Russia.

Absolute Power corrupts Absolutely

The sentence was clearly issued under pressure from the executive authorities, headed as before by Mr Putin, said defence lawyer Yuri Shmidt. Putin signaled to the court who today is the boss and who today decides Khodorkovskys fate and life, he said.

A Victim of Oppressive Power: 6 more years in Jail

Moscow judge Viktor Danilkin sentenced Khodorkovsky to the additional six years in prison after convicting him on multibil! lion-dol lar theft and money-laundering charges.

Danilkin granted the prosecutors sentencing request and said Khodorkovsky would serve a total of 14 years in prison, including time served since his arrest in October 2003, meaning he is to remain in jail until 2017.

Western officials had said the guilty verdict raised doubts about the Kremlins commitment to the rule of law and human rights, and they were closely watching the case.

The outcome of Khodorkovskys second trial could cause friction with Europe and strain the reset that has improved ties between the United States and Russia. Russia said the trial was a matter for its courts and rejected as groundless US suggestions that the verdict resulted from selective justice. Reuters


See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

MAS debacle: A-G must explain ties with Tajuddin


By Queville To

KUALA LUMPUR: Outspoken Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) adviser Robert Phang has again trained his gun on Attorney-General Gani Patail for his deafening silence over his consorting with Shahidan Shafiee, the proxy of former Malaysia Airlines chairman, Tajuddin Ramli.

He described such a stance by Gani as a great disservice to the government in the fight against corruption.

I have raised this before and the A-G's continued silence is deafening. PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayob has now raised the same issue.

"This is not just a political issue but it also concerns the integrity of the highest law officer of the country. His actions and conduct can erode the credibility of the government, he said in his New Year Message here yesterday.

There is also public scepticism over the conduct of the A-G in the exercise of his prosecutorial powers, he added.

His reluctance to act in certain cases, while very vociferous in others, have given rise to allegations of selective prosecution bordering on persecution, he said.

He noted that Salahuddin, too, has raised this seemingly double-standard practice involving the case of Rosli Dahlan who is widely known to be the lawyer handling the MAS case who has alleged that he had been victimised by rogue elements in the government.

It is frightening that the whole machinery of the A-Gs office and the MACC can be used against one man.

"The government must dispel this perception of persecution against an innocent citizen, he said.

Phang reiterated that he has raised these matters without any personal or political agenda.

I am not a politician. I speak for what I believe to be true and right. These are matters that have been in the public domain and it is incumbent on me to remind the powers that be of the public displeasure.

"Only in this way ci! vil acti vists like me can be of service to the nation, the government and the public. This is consistent with the reminder by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak that those in power must not suffer from the four diseases delusion, amnesia, inertia and arrogance.

"I pray that all civil servants, more so the politicians and ministers, will follow rigidly Najib's directive, he said.

MACC work laudable

While applauding the achievements of MACC chief commissioner Abu Kassim in bringing to book some big names this year, including former minister Dr Ling Liong Sik in the alleged misappropriation of funds in the Port Klang Free Zone, Phang said the report by the forensic auditors has mentioned several other big names, including those still serving government, and who are also big names in their political party.

These big names have quickly used the MACCs clearance as a political mileage.

"This has invited public scepticism, especially when it is perceived that a thorough investigation has not been conducted and the clearance was just a political whitewash.

"That was what the public perceived in the case of former Selangor menteri besar Khir Toyo until he was charged recently. I remind these big names not to be so gleeful, bordering on arrogance, he said.

With regard to the New Key Result Areas (NKRAs) for reduction of crimes, he congratulated Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein for his hard work in developing innovative ways to assist the police in the fight against crime.

"Like a clean white sheet, it is now in Hishammuddin's hands to re-shape the police force into the principal respected law enforcement agency that it once was. Malaysians must support Inspector-General Ismail Omar in his goal for a crime-free society, he said.

Phang, who is also chairman of Social Care Foundation, also called on NGOs like Ikim (Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia) and Perkasa, not to cause confusion and racial tension among the people.

Regardl! ess of w hether we are Muslims, Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists or any other faiths, the plurality of faiths of this country must be preserved.

"I urge Ikim and Perkasa not to cause confusion by fanning the differences between us, but to build on the commonality that binds us. Its a folly to claim that one's religion or god is the right one. All religions teach good things and we all believe in the one true God.

All talks that cause differences, tensions and schisms must stop. If May 13, 1969, is to be remembered, it should be commemorated as a day of mourning when this multi-cultural and multi-religious country of ours was almost ruined.

"It must be our national resolution that May 13 must not recur or Malaysia will become a failed nation. It is our commonality that binds us as a nation since independence and that will shape our future destiny as 1Malaysian, he said.

He added that Malaysia is a country of many faiths and although Islam is the official religion, the freedom to practise other faiths and religions is guaranteed.

How we prosper as a nation cannot be based on fortune-telling and guessing games but on hard facts, sound policies and universal principles found in our religions, he added.

Phang called on all Malaysians to make the pursuit of unity, truth and justice their New Year resolution. - FMT


See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?

Why Do People Become Obsessed With Celebrities?

by wiki.ONE.pedia

You only have to step into a local shop and look at the rows and rows of glossy magazines to see that we are a nation that is obsessed with celebrity. Heat magazine is one of the biggest selling magazines in the UK with a circulation of over half a million, and this is only one of a long list of celebrity gossip magazines that is produced each week.

The title of the ultimate British celebrity magazine should probably go to Ok! magazine. It is a favourite of many celebrities who will turn to the magazine to reveal any revelations or scandal in their lives. Ok! covers more celebrity weddings, pregnancies and engagements than any other magazines. Most celebrities will use Ok! as a platform to promote something good in their lives and it is well known that they will receive a hefty payment in return. Ok! magazine was first published in 1993 and since then there has been a huge influx in rival magazines all claiming to be the first port of call for inside celebrity gossip.

But what is it about celebrity that fascinates us so much? In my opinion there is more than one reason. For some people it is simply a case of lifestyle envy. Celebrities appear to have it all: money, looks, a fabulous lifestyle and worldwide recognition. They seem to live a magical lifestyle that some of us aspire to achieve. Celebrities have become a new form of god figure and we allow ourselves to fantasise that our lives could one day be like theirs. Some people even feel that proximity to celebrities will elevate them from a normal person to celebrity status. Or perhaps they think that maybe they can befriend a rich celeb and that they will share some of their wealth with them? Either way this is a pretty deluded state of mind. It is very unlikely that a celebrity will allow an average Joe to ride on the coat tails of his or her success.

Another reason for our celebrity obsession is our natural human instinct to be interested in other human beings. Essentially we are pretty nosy creatures. We like to hear what is going on in the lives of people around us. This becomes heightened when directed at the world of celebrity as their lives are so different and more extravagant than ours. We are naturally fascinated by the unknown and unfamiliar. However, this curiosity can be a double-edged sword. We are fascinated by the seemingly perfect lives of celebrities but at the same time we are always waiting for something to go wrong.

We do not always want to hear how well someone is doing and it is a well known fact that scandal always sells more than good news. Sometimes it takes someone else’s bad news to make us feel better about our lives. Of course this seems a twisted logic but it is a fact, and the magazine circulation numbers back this up. People are much more likely to want to read about a married footballer’s sleazy affair with a page three model than the good news that a pop star is set to break America. Just look at the current Cheryl and Ashley Cole situation. The bottom line is: scandal sells.

Each week the media churn out pictures of flawless celebrities that have been air-brushed thus setting an unrealistic goal for the likes of you and me. This is why when a celeb is spotted without her makeup we feel better because they are instantly put on a level with the average person. An element of normality is created. We rejoice in seeing a celeb looking bad because it makes us feel better about our bad hair days and so-called fat days. `

A way of feeling closer to our favourite celebrities and idols is to collect memorabilia associated with them. If we own a piece of signed memorabilia it is as if we have some sort of connection or are paying homage to them in some sense. Avid fans often keep large collections of items associated with a certain celebrity and invest a certain amount of emotion into their collection. If you or someone close to you is looking to add to their collection or perhaps start a collection of treasured articles then visit Genuine Memorabilia’s online website. The company boasts a collection of over 6,000 signed articles to choose from. It includes memorabilia from the world of sport, film, rock and pop, theatre and television. Visit Genuine Memorabilia today.

MACC Panel Advisor Robert Phang calls A-G Gani Patail a Rogue

December 31, 2010

MACC Panel Advisor Robert Phang calls A-G Gani Patail a Rogue

by Din Merican

In his New Year Resolution Wish for all Malaysians, Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin, Panel Advisor, Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) sent a sobering message to the PM Najib and his government. He asked our Prime Minister to handle firmly IKIM, PERKASA and Attorney-General Gani Patail.

Phang launched a veiled yet blistering attack against these three destructive elements that threaten unity, truth and justice in our country. While many perceived IKIMs statement on Santa Claus to be irrational, religious intolerance towards other faiths became more apparent when Prime Minister Najibs aides directed church officials to remove crucifixes and other overt Christian symbols from being displayed at the Catholic Archbishops Christmas tea party at Bukit Nanas, Kuala Lumpur which was attended by PM Najib. The whole objective of the PMs presence to show unity, racial harmony, and religious tolerance (1Malaysia) was immediately erased.

Tan Sri Robert Phang

In the same press statement which was posted by Malaysia Today, Tan Sri Robert Phang also took a swipe at A-G Gani Patail. Referring to a statement, made only a few days ago, by YB Salahudin Ayob, Vice President of PAS, that Gani Patail is a Bajingan dalam Kerajaan , Phang also called AG Gani Patail a rogue element in government and questioned the A-Gs exercise of his prosecutorial powers which smacks of selective prosecution bordering on persecution. He said said that it is frightening that the whole machinery of the A-Gs office and the MACC can be used against an innocent citizen in relation to the A-Gs t! reatment of lawyer Rosli Dahlan.

Lawyer Rosli Dahlan isolated and left in the cold

I praise Robert Phang for his press statement. It is an inspiring and brave statement. It is refreshing when someone within the establishment, like Phang, dare to criticise what is wrong within the government. He makes it clear that his membership in the MACC Panel is not just to be a rubberstamp. If there is one Tan Sri who has earned that honorific title, it is Phang.

Thus, the best I can do is to reproduce his Press Statement below. Thank you Tan Sri Robert Phang.

December 29, 2010

Press Statement by Tan Sri Datuk Robert Phang Miow Sin.
Justice of Peace
Chairman Social Care Foundation
Panel Advisor, Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)

Make Unity, Truth and Justice as New Year Resolutions for Malaysians

1. On Friday December 31, 2010, we will say goodbye to 2010 and usher in 2011. Fortune tellers, astrologers and Feng Shui practitioners will review the events of past years in self glorification of the accuracy of their predictions. They will attempt to provide new prophecies and guidance to forecast events and good fortunes for the coming year. But, they do it for commercial gains.

2. As a social activist, I would like to address the fundamentals that are of importance to us as a progressive nation. Malaysia is a country of faiths. It is stated that Islam is the official Religion of the Federation but at the same time, freedom to practice other faiths and religions is guaranteed. How we prosper as a na! tion can not be based on fortune telling and guessing games but on hard facts, sound policies and universal principles to be gathered from our faiths and religions.

3. Whether we are Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists or of any other faith, the plurality of faiths of this country must be preserved. I call on IKIM and Perkasa not to cause confusion by fanning the differences between us, but to build on the commonality that binds us. Its a folly to claim whose religion or whose god is the right one. All religions teach good things and we all believe in ONE TRUE GOD.

4. Thus, all talk that cause differences, tensions and schisms must stop. If May 13, 1969, is to be remembered, it should be commemorated as a day of mourning when this multi-cultural and multi-religious beloved country of ours was almost ruined. Thus, it must be our national resolution that May 13th must not recur or Malaysia will become a failed state. It is our commonality that binds us as a nation since Independence and that will shape our future destiny as 1Malaysian!

5. With regard to the New Key Result Areas (NKRAs) for reduction of crimes, I congratulate Home Minister Dato Seri Hishamuddin Tun Hussein Onn, who has worked hard and developed innovative ways to assist the PDRM in the fight against crime. I also congratulate Dato Seri Hishammudin for understanding the importance of public perception and thus ended the former IGPs tenure. Compared to his predecessor, Tan Sri Ismail Omar is a breath of fresh air. Like a clean white sheet, it is now in his hands to re-shape PDRM (Royal Malaysian Police) into the principal respected law enforcement agency that it once was. We, Malaysians, must support Tan Sri Ismail Omar, the current IGP, to aspire for a crime free society.

6. As a Panel Advisor of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), I applaud the achievements of the MACCs Chief Commissioner, Dato Seri Abu Kassim, in bringing to book some big names this year. In the PKFZ case, Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik has been charg! ed. Howe ver, the report by the forensic auditors mentioned several other big names, including those still serving in government and are also big names in their political party. These big names have quickly used the MACCs clearance as a political mileage. This has invited public skepticism, especially when it is perceived that a thorough investigation has not been conducted and the clearance was just a political whitewash. That was what the public perceived in the case of former Selangor MB Dato Seri Dr Khir Toyo until he was charged recently. I remind these big names not to be so gleeful, bordering on arrogance.

7. The public also view with grave suspicion the allegations over the personal conduct of Attorney-General (A-G) Tan Sri Gani Patail who is seen as consorting with Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramlis proxy, Shahidan Shafiee. This is of great disservice to the government in the fight against corruption. I have raised this before and the A-Gs continued silence is deafening. PAS vice president Salahuddin Ayob has now raised the same issue. This is not just a political issue but it also concerns the integrity of the highest law officer of the country. His actions and conduct can erode the credibility of the government.

8. There is also public skepticism over the conduct of the A-G, in the exercise of his prosecutorial powers. His reluctance to act in certain cases, while very vociferous in others, have given rise to allegations of selective prosecution bordering on persecution. YB Salahudin Ayob also raised this seeming double standards involving the case of lawyer En Rosli Dahlan. En Rosli is widely known to be the lawyer handling the MAS case and has alleged that he had been victimised by rogue elements in the government. It is frightening to the citizens at large that the whole machinery of the A-Gs office and the MACC can be used against one man. The government must dispel this perception of persecution against an innocent citizen.

9. I have raised these matters without any personal or political ag! enda. I am not a politician. I speak for what I believe to be true and right. These are matters that have been in the public domain and it is incumbent on me to remind the powers that be of the public displeasure. Only in this way civil activists like me can be of service to the nation, the government and the public. This is consistent with the reminder by the Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak that those in power must not suffer from the four diseases Delusion, Amnesia, Inertia and Arrogance.

10. In closing 2010s chapter and in welcoming 2011, I pray for Gods Blessings upon all of us and that we become a truly 1Malaysia nation in the pursuit for Unity, Truth And Justice. I wish all Malaysians a Happy & Blessed New Year!

HUMBLENESS IS GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL, THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD.

Tan Sri Robert Phang Miow Sin

Justice of Peace

I also reproduce an international news article about the sham trial of former Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky seen by many democratic nations of the world as a test of the rule of law in Russia. It is something for us in Malaysia to remember that we wil still be regarded as a Pariah state regardless that we achieve economic success. PM Najib should take note of all these if he is intending to call GE 13 next year. PM Najib should remove all the rogue elements in the government!

Khodorkovsky lawyer blames Putin for client sentence
December 30, 2010

Freedom is a Universal Right

A man holds a portrait of Mikhail Khodorkovsky at a picket in support of the former oil tycoon near the court building in Moscow today, December 30, 2010. Russia accused the United States and Europe of trying to influence the trial of Khodorkovsky, callin! g such e fforts unacceptable and warning the West to mind its own business.

MOSCOW, December 30 The lawyer of jailed former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky today blamed Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin for his clients sentence of six more years in prison in a court case seen by some Western nations as a test of the rule of law in Russia.

Absolute Power corrupts Absolutely

The sentence was clearly issued under pressure from the executive authorities, headed as before by Mr Putin, said defence lawyer Yuri Shmidt. Putin signalled to the court who today is the boss and who today decides Khodorkovskys fate and life, he said.

A Victim of Oppressive Power: 6 more years in Jail

Moscow judge Viktor Danilkin sentenced Khodorkovsky to the additional six years in prison after convicting him on multibillion-dollar theft and money-laundering charges.

Danilkin granted the prosecutors sentencing request and said Khodorkovsky would serve a total of 14 years in prison, including time served since his arrest in October 2003, meaning he is to remain in jail until 2017.

Western officials had said the guilty verdict raised doubts about the Kremlins commitment to the rule of law and human rights, and they were closely watching the case.

The outcome of Khodorkovskys second trial could cause friction with Europe and strain the reset that has improved ties between the United States and Russia. Russia said the trial was a matter for its courts and rejected as groundless US suggestions that the verdict resulted from selective justice. Reuters


See What Barisan Nasional Gotta Say?

The Untouchables at Khazanah, TM and Axiata-Part 1

The chronicle of the story does NOT match the internal annals you have. Are you starting to see similar statements coming from Khazanah, TM as well as Axiata?
From Oct 2004 to February 2006, Alcatel bribed supervision officials in Malaysia to obtain trusted inform relating to the open proposal which Alcatel ultimately won, the result of which yielded the telecommunications stipulate valued during you estimate US$85 million. It was additionally reported which the TM employees who perceived bribes were "foreign officials" inside of the definition of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as "were in the poignant in front of to change the process decisions Telekom Malaysia made." It added the Basel-based Alcatel Standard done poignant lump-sum payments through US bank accounts to dual consultants labeled "Malaysian Consultant A" as well as "Malaysian Consultant B", purportedly for marketplace research. "Alcatel Standard paid US$200,000 to Malaysian Consultant A in 2005 for the series of 'market reports' describing conditions in the Malaysian telecommunications market. Similarly, Alcatel Standard paid US$500,000 to Malaysian Consultant B in 2005 for the 'strategic comprehension report'. "However, the work product these consultants rebuilt could not justify the distance of Alcatel Standard's payments. In fact, Malaysian Consultant A as well as Malaysian Consultant B did not crop up to render any legitimate services to Alcatel Malaysia in tie with these
In alternative words the dual buggers who perceived USD 700,000 conned Alcatel into profitable them the money. The giver has admitted their crime. They admitted they bribed. They have been fined as well as legally prosecuted. See here? Unless the charge is associated to the crime, afterwards the charges stick. Otherwise you rubbish open income as well as time. As the passing mention- you charged Khir Toyo for securing the piece of land during the most cheaper price which when it was initial obtained? Stupidity is not the crime! . If it is, afterwards you should alter the seller. Pull out all of Khir's teeth. Court order him from eating tempe. Where is the crime? That charge contingency describe to the crime.
Same thing with Sime Darby. Why didn't it usually inform to the police? Or to MACC? Unless the charges have been associated to the little crime, the charges will usually be the wipe-out.
Unless you have the opposite set of laws which contend what the dual guys did wasn't the crime, you will actually see the matter during the commencement of this article. It will be the cabinet fast assembled to cover the backsides of most people. People from Khazanah, people from TM then, people from MOF even.
So, it is really perplexing, which you have been usually starting with an investigative committee. It would crop up which what TM as well as Axiata have been you do is to arrange the group to cover the misdeeds of the little people. TM or Axiata shouldn't rubbish their time as well as income (whose money?) to whitewash this part as well as should usually make the military inform about the crime carrying been committed.
So:-
Telekom Malaysia Bhd (TM) has set up the house sub-committee to examine the Alcatel Lucent SA (ALU) kickbacks scandal which implicates dual Malaysian officials in the US$85 million (RM263.5 million) stipulate given out by the internal telecoms giant. Regional mobile phone use provider Axiata Bhd has additionally promised to examine the temptation case as it occurred in 2006 when it was the TM division well well known as Telekom Malaysia International (TMI). Both public-listed companies, which share the common shareholder sovereign resources fund Khazanah Nasional Berhad announced their respective investigations in filings to Bursa Malaysia last night.
Bursa Malaysia? Wasn't this the classification headed by the former Shell Legal Manager who has actually once said, which anything sanctioned by Khazanah should be treated with colour as gospel truth? That those most admired denizens du! ring Kha zanah have been the Malaysian chronicle of The Untouchables?
Let's go over the obvious. Any preference on capex expenditures by any of the Khazanah owned companies contingency have been referred to Khazanah. Azman Mokhtar who swears by the various coloured manuals which Khazanah operates by, will never concede any capex expenditures upheld without notice. He is after all an honorable man. He has brought the brand new enlightenment of handling Khazanah. His character is cheese compared to chalk of previous stewards of Khazanah.
It's the brand new age Khazanah which acquires shares as well as sell down in the open market. It doesn't want to sell to PNB? Isn't which strategic? To me, what Khazanah is you do is additionally similar to the standard BUmiputera who gets shares as well as afterwards cash out. Same sting operations. Khazanah is afterwards as rotten as those Bumis who got shares as well as sold RM52 billion of the 54 which were released to them underneath NEP. It's the brand new age Khazanah which is additionally debt ridden as well as issues sukuk as well as bonds here as well as there.
As to CAPEX spending generally if they have been outrageous decisions on who to appoint as vendors contingency additionally be done inside of the full believe of Khazanah.
When TM got the permit to operate the 3G services, it carried out proposal exercises to secure the best vendors. Vendors contingency have been evaluated in conditions of acceptability, lane record as well as technical reputability. Hence, when TM called for tenders to supply them with the equipment, most were invited including those with lesser lane record such as Huawei of China. Well well well known players such as Erickson, Nokia were additionally invited.
In the initial proviso of installing the 3G services Huawei of China appeared to be the the one preferred vendor. The appointment of Huawei as the businessman for the Klang Valley was pushed hard by several directors of TM. It was roughly supposed but for the persisten! ce of th e little people who insisted which Huawei lacked the lane record. The resolution offered by Huawei was supposed by usually one or dual countries during which time. On the alternative hand the solutions offered by alternative obvious as well as attempted vendors such as Nokia as well as Erickson were applied in most some-more countries. As the compromise, it was motionless which Nokia would be appointed businessman for the Klang Valley as well as Huawei can be used to exam the technical capabilities in peripheral areas such as Penang as well as Johor.
To recap: in proviso one which is bottom period, Nokia as well as Huawei were the vendors.
We come to the second phase. When time came for expanding the 3G services, following the some-more or reduction compromised proceed during the initial phase, the same protocols were followed. Huawei as well as Nokia as well as others with proven lane annals were invited to bid for tenders for the enlargement of the 3G services.
Read carefully this. When everyone of the solutions providers had been called, Azman Mokhtar perceived the gentle poke from someone in MOF to " tolong Alcatel kalau boleh". This someone from MOF (remember during this time, MOF has MOF1 as well as MOF2) contingency have been the persuasive nudger; because Azman MOkhtar interpreted which tolong kalau boleh tolong as mesti tolong.
But Azman Mohtar is an honorable man. He swears by the yellow book, green book as well as what books.


Derek Sivers: How to start a movement

68 people liked this
With help from some surprising footage, Derek Sivers explains how movements really get started. (Hint: it takes two.)

20 things we learned in 2010


The New Year


Observer writers and experts chart the concepts, trends and buzz words that defined the past year and are likely to shape the next one

1 The new politics is, in fact, the old politics

Nick Clegg will regret many things about 2010. One will be his decision to produce a Lib Dem election poster warning that the Tories would raise VAT. A few weeks later Clegg, installed as deputy prime minister, was backing coalition plans to – yes – raise VAT.

Then there was the pre-election pledge to vote against any rise in tuition fees. Six months later Clegg was pushing a policy to triple them.

These shifts were damaging not just because they were old-fashioned U-turns but because they fatally undermined the party's raison d'etre – its commitment to deliver a new, honest politics. A vote for the Lib Dems, Clegg had said, would be "a vote that counts".

It was all part of his broader attempt to promote the merits of voting reform – the Lib Dems' core policy. Fair votes through proportional representation would mean that everyone's vote would matter and everyone's voice would be heard.

Floating the idea of "new politics" and calling for an end to the duopoly of the "old parties" made Clegg more popular than Churchill for a while. But it is dangerous to take the moral high ground in politics.

A mid-December poll for the News of the World found 61% of respondents saying that they didn't trust Clegg, compared to 24% in April. In a few months, he had gone from being one of the most trusted politicians to one of the least trusted.

To many, the "new politics" had begun to feel very much like old politics – if not rather worse, as angry protests hit the streets and chants rang out about promises broken. Toby Helm

2 Kanye West is pop's top innovator

In 2009, Kanye West had the distinction of being called a "jackass" by the US president, after rudely interrupting an acceptance speech by his fellow performer Taylor Swift at an awards show.

The contrast with this year could scarcely be greater, with the rapper's fifth album, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, voted the best of 2010 by publications including Time magazine, Rolling Stone, Billboard and Spin, as well as by influential music website Pitchfork.

Dazzlingly inventive, the album lived up to the expectations that West himself had placed on it: breaking with conventional practice, he eschewed print interviews but turned up at the offices of Facebook and Twitter to rap early versions of his songs to staff there. West then tweeted his followers, hilariously, with his thoughts on everything from Persian rugs to the merits of Leonard Bernstein.

This week's latest aphorism? "Black is the new black." Caspar Llewellyn Smith

3 A finger bone made us rethink the Tree of Life

The discovery of a human finger bone and a tooth in the Denisova cave, in Siberia, sparked one of the year's most unlikely scientific sensations. DNA found in the 30,000-year-old finger bone fragment was analysed at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and found to belong to a previously unknown species of human. "The [DNA] sequence is similar in some ways to humans, but still quite distinct," said project leader Johannes Krause.

Crucially, the Denisova hominid was the first to be identified from its DNA alone, its structure indicating that modern humans and the unknown cave dweller shared a common ancestor a million years ago. By contrast, modern humans and Neanderthals – a separate species of human that became extinct 40,000 years ago – shared a common ancestor only 450,000 years ago.

The uncovering of the new species is particularly intriguing because it follows the discovery, in 2004, of Homo floresiensis – the Hobbit folk of Flores, in the East Indies. Members of the latter species of tiny cavemen were still living 13,000 years ago.

This means that in the very recent past there were at least four different human beings in existence: Neanderthals, Denisova hominids, Hobbit folk, and, of course, Homo sapiens. The notion that human evolution progressed in a simple, single line, from ape to human, is simply wrong. Our species has continued to experiment and create different forms throughout its existence – withHomo sapiens only recently emerging as the winner. Robin McKie

4 WikiLeaks suggests that secrets are no more

For a long time now, since digital media became the defining characteristic of our age, a revolution in information and secrecy has been predicted. WikiLeaks, and in particular the continuing exposure of US embassy cables, allows us for the first time to see the contours of that revolution – and some of the implications.

Chief among them seems to be the fact that even the best resourced and most confidential of organisations can no longer rely on a properly secure intelligence network. What once could be stamped "top secret" and locked away in a filing cabinet now becomes digitised and potentially accessible to any number of people with a keyboard and a broadband connection. Diplomats, politicians and business leaders around the world will no doubt overnight become more circumspect about expressing any for-your-eyes-only opinion.

The phrase "citizen journalism" often attaches itself to WikiLeaks, as if this was a new phenomenon, but journalism has always relied on leaks and tipoffs and secrets from the wider public. What the internet, and its communities of information gatherers, allows is for this to be done on a more epic and anonymous scale. In this new world, as Julian Assange has acknowledged by using trusted news organisations to reveal the secrets, the process of editing and sifting and contextualising stories becomes more crucial than ever.

If WikiLeaks represents one version of future transparency, recent events have also revealed how those with information to protect will begin to shape the argument against that transparency. Assange was originally scrupulous in trying to avoid his medium becoming the message: it was the information that was important, not the individual or organisation that brought it to the public domain. As the bizarre circus around Assange now proves, however, news generally refuses to be depersonalised. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the particular extradition case, there will always be interests that will move to undermine and destroy the messenger, even as they lose control of the message. Tim Adams

5 Billionaires can be highly generous

In May, America's two wealthiest citizens, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, arranged three separate dinners with those who occupied the positions directly below them in the US rich list: Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Oprah Winfrey and the rest.

One result was that Buffett and Gates went public in June with what they called the Giving Pledge, an appeal to the conscience of their fellow billionaires that now was the time to donate half their wealth to solving some of the world's problems. So far, 40 have signed up. Buffett had set the ball rolling by pledging 99% of his $70bn (£45.5bn) fortune to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

You can see how the Giving Pledge is developing at givingpledge.org and read letters from, among others, Michael Bloomberg, Paul Allen, Ted Turner and George Lucas. Bloomberg writes: "The reality of great wealth is that you can't spend it and you can't take it with you. For decades, I've been committed to giving away the vast majority of my wealth to causes that I'm passionate about. And so I am enthusiastically taking the Giving Pledge, and nearly all of my net worth will be given away in the years ahead."

Sceptics say charity and aid never transformed societies. Gates and Buffett, though, point to the fact that in a few short years of their targeted health policies they have eradicated polio from all but three countries; they now have their sights on malaria. You can only hope the Giving Pledge proves contagious. TA

6 Great fiction can still make a huge impact

It kicked off in August, when Time put Jonathan Franzen on its cover, the first time the honour had been bestowed on a living writer in a decade. Then the reviews appeared, uniformly ecstatic at first, proclaiming Freedom, Franzen's long-awaited follow-up to The Corrections, a "work of total genius", a "masterpiece of American fiction", a rival even to Tolstoy. Not everyone was so bowled over: one leading US magazine described the book as a "576-page monument to insignificance", while novelists Jennifer Weiner and Jodi Picoult complained on Twitter about white male authors getting all the attention.

By the time Freedom reached Britain, in late September, its momentum was irresistible; not even the small matter of an error-strewn first print run could derail it. It all helped to turn Franzen into the most talked-about writer of 2010 – and Freedom the best, or most overrated, novel of the year, decade, or perhaps the century. William Skidelsky

7 German foreign policy is no longer about atonement

On 11 May, a headline in Bild, Germany's biggest tabloid newspaper, declared: "We are the schmucks of Europe yet again." It was a tame lament, but the fit of national pique it expressed was momentous. The government had just provided emergency cash to rescue Greece from a budget crisis. Germans were unimpressed. Why, they asked, should their taxes pay for corrupt civil servants in Athens to retire early?

Chancellor Angela Merkel had little choice but to bail out the single currency – Germany had as much to lose as any member if it collapsed – but the debate revealed a change in self-image. Germany has traditionally seen integration with neighbours not only as a question of economic advantage but of moral urgency. It was a duty to atone for the sins of Nazism.

Time has weakened the taboo. Germany wants to behave like every other country, and not be embarrassed to promote its national interest. During the boom, it was well served by the euro. But broke members can quickly become a drag. Germany, meanwhile, feels a certain pious resentment for having run a budget surplus, staying sober at the financial party while everyone else got drunk. Now it's closing time, the other euro members come pestering Berlin for lifts home.

Sorry, no money for petrol either. Merkel sits testily behind the wheel, but patience is running thin. In the future, Germany cannot be relied upon as Europe's designated driver. Rafael Behr

8 Students are leading the way in social protest

In an interview with the Observer, Aaron Porter, president of the National Union of Students, described the level of youth activism in 2010 as "unprecedented", or at least not seen since the 1960s.

It began with a march that saw 50,000 students, lecturers, schoolchildren, anarchists and more pour on to the streets of London in protest at the prospect of tuition fees being almost trebled to £9,000 a year. A peaceful march turned violent, with protesters breaking into the Conservative headquarters at Millbank. Soon recriminations were flying. But one thing was clear: the events of November tapped into a mood and triggered a youth movement that would keep going, a great force unleashed by a response to a policy about fees that came alongside the largest cuts to public services in a generation. From then on, the students kept on coming, from organised marches in Westminster to impromptu rallies elsewhere.

Some events were dominated by anarchists and the far left, but often it was the students leading the way, unmasked and angry as they waved their placards and hollered that their dreams were being destroyed. There was even a return of the student occupation, with lecture theatres taken over across the country. The passion of the young, it seems, had not gone away – it was just waiting to be reignited. Anushka Asthana

9 Bond vigilantes are new masters of the universe

Forget helpless politicians and on-the-spot bankers, the winners of 2010 have been asset managers who invest the billions in our pension and insurance pots in the bond market. Firms such as Pimco or BlackRock run funds 10 times bigger than the economies of Ireland, Portugal or Greece. If they start selling those bonds, the borrowing costs of those countries rise.

The "vigilantes", however, are not evil speculators or millionaire investors, but professionals in London, Frankfurt and Zurich who want their money back. They press countries to slash ballooning deficits as they fear that after the spending extravaganza seen in Britain, Spain, Greece and Ireland over the past decade, these sovereign nations may not be able to pay them back.

The prime ministers of Britain, Spain and Greece had to succumb to the new masters as the year progressed, even if that caused riots on the streets. Elena Moya

10 Many of us live in the squeezed middle

A couple with a combined salary of, say, £50,000 a year, are in the top fifth of British earners. But suppose they bought a house at the top of the boom with a whopping mortgage. Throw in bills, petrol, credit card debts, children, and the family doesn't feel very rich.

People earning much less – the majority – have been pushed by the recession to live on narrow margins indeed. Many were kept afloat in the boom by low interest rates, low inflation and easy access to credit. Their insecurity in a chilly economic climate emerged this year as perhaps the most important force shaping British politics.

"We must understand," Ed Miliband wrote, "why, despite all that was achieved over the last decade, so many people who work hard and want to get on came to feel squeezed."

As political rhetoric "the squeezed middle" is a felicitous phrase, but the concept is baggy. The political class that touts its empathy has no real experience of meagre wages and unemployment. Media portrayals of what is "middle class" often depict an elite tier, which persuades itself it is "average" by enviously eyeing the opulence of footballers and bankers.

Meanwhile, VAT goes up at the start of next year. Inflation is rising and with it the prospect of higher interest rates and mortgage arrears. Ever more people will be caught in the middle. RB

11 The iPad promises to transform publishing

With all the hyperbole and bunting of a quasi-religious experience, Apple unleashed its touchscreen tablet computer on the world in April 2010. After the hollow promise of digital revenues on the web, news, magazine and book publishers embraced the iPad from the start, reassured by Apple's locked-down payment system and a covetable device pitched firmly at a small but wealthy demographic.

Apps, they discovered, might only dress content up in a different way, but with some clever customisation consumers perceive enough value to pay for it. After giving away content for years in the name of audience building, and then charging pennies for tentative iPhone apps, publishers found they could charge anything up to £4.99 for iPad apps, resulting in digital, at last, paying something like the same as print.

Even Rupert Murdoch made no attempt to disguise his enthusiasm for what he described as a "game-changing device". News Corp has reportedly been working with Apple on The Daily, a dedicated iPad newspaper to be launched in January – complete with video and 3D content.

But publishers are unwise to rely too heavily on the iPad for salvation. An expensive and niche device, it can only supplement rather than replace the desktop screen. Publishers still need to find a way to make the internet pay – and on a platform that doesn't involve handing a 30% cut to Apple with every sale. Jemima Kiss

12 Super salmon could help feed the world

Inevitably, it was dubbed the "Frankenfish" following September's announcement that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was holding final consultations prior to permitting the sale of genetically engineered fish. The fish, the GM Atlantic salmon, grows twice as fast as its wild cousin, its genes having been augmented with DNA from the Pacific Chinook salmon and an ocean pout (Zoarces americanus) in order to boost its growth. Final approval to allow sale of the GM salmon is now expected early next year. Its creator, the Massachusetts company AquaBounty Technologies, says it has done everything possible to show farmed GM salmon is safe, while a coalition of greens has attacked the proposed sale as a threat to humans and the environment. RMcK

13 Deepwater drilling is a complex business

On 20 April, a surge in pressure sent oil spurting up a drill pipe below BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig, 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico. The pressure dislodged a column of sludge intended to keep the oil underground, causing an explosion that killed 11 workers and injured 17.

The disaster caused an underwater rupture that left oil gushing into the ocean for almost three months. Just how much oil polluted the water is still fiercely debated – the US government says it was 5m barrels' worth. BP, which has to pay a fine of at least $1,100 per barrel spilled, insists the true figure was 20% to 50% lower. Either way, it was an enormous quantity, scarring delicate wetland wildernesses and suspending the livelihoods of thousands along America's coast.

The spill prompted the Obama administration to impose an embargo on deepwater drilling as engineers struggled to understand how several failsafe mechanisms had failed – including a sophisticated blowout preventer intended to slam shut the pipe.

Initially, BP alone was blamed by the White House. More recently, investigators have suggested Britain's biggest company shared responsibility with two US subcontractors – Transocean, which owned the rig, and Halliburton, accused of botching a cement job intended to seal the well.

For BP and the rest of the oil industry, the consequences of a human and environmental tragedy will reverberate for years to come. Andrew Clark

14 Facebook seeks to outgoogle Google

Many people may now be feeling that they have underestimated Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's fresh-faced founder and chief executive. "Until a year ago, he thought this might be the next Google, but he wasn't sure," a friend of his told the FT in December. "Now he's sure. The fear is gone."

The subject of David Fincher's film The Social Network this year, Zuckerberg now strikes terror into the hearts of his commercial rivals. Google clearly views Apple and Facebook, rather than Microsoft, as the enemy – certainly in terms of the advertising that generates 97% of Google's revenues, $22.89bn (£14.87bn) for 2009.

Social media is the one key area where Google has largely failed, and Facebook has proved there is money to be made. More worrying for Google, Facebook is also having some success in convincing consumers that the best way to navigate the web is through the opinions and recommendations of a network of friends and contacts.

Facebook is rapidly translating that behaviour into advertising revenue, delivering personalised, cost-effective targeting. Estimates put Facebook's revenues at $2bn for 2010.

The last straw for Google may prove to be a draining away of talent. Facebook is fast siphoning off the best engineers. With around a tenth of Google's 23,300 employees, Facebook is smaller, lighter and crucially faster. And with Facebook "almost guaranteed" to reach a billion users, according to Zuckerberg, Google will have to get used to sharing the limelight. JK

15 Kinect allows us all to play

For 40 years we've struggled with the intricacies of the video-game joypad, all those analogue sticks, buttons and triggers – then Microsoft makes it all absolutely redundant. Launched on 10 November, the Kinect system for the Xbox 360 console employs an infrared emitter and a webcam to track player movements, converting them into on-screen action. You can leap, dance, sing and smile at this thing, and it registers it all.

With Kinect, gaming is all about breaking down the barrier between you and your TV. In the future, we'll get games where we become virtual actors, talking to on-screen characters. But for now, the sheer delight of moving your arms and seeing an on-screen character mimic the motion is enough. It could be that advanced motion control is to games what the introduction of sound was to movies: a major gear shift. Certainly we learned what the Wii hinted at – that everyone can play.Keith Stuart

16 China is chasing the US for global supremacy

Two years ago, with the global financial system on the brink of meltdown, the world's leading powers managed to co-ordinate their response at summits of the G20 group of nations. In 2010, that co-operative spirit died. The main reason was an epic rivalry between China and the US – the G2. In August, China edged past Japan to take second place behind the US in the league of large economies, with gross domestic product of around $1.3 trillion.

But the new superpower's growth relies on pumping cheap exports into consumer markets abroad. Battered by recession, US manufacturers see subsidised Chinese exports as tools of economic aggression. In November, a G20 summit resulted in a tepid agreement by all nations to try to "resist protectionist measures". That was code for an uneasy truce between Washington and Beijing – but neither is in any doubt that the race for supremacy is now on. RB

17 3D film and TV are here to stay

Christopher Nolan, the innovative film director, says he finds 3D "alienating", seeming to hope it's a passing fad. But the technology isn't going anywhere – it's making far too much money for that. Let's pluck, from 20-odd 3D films released this year, March's Clash of the Titans. Hurriedly converted to 3D in the wake of James Cameron's Avatar, it was a confirmed mess – but took more than £300m worldwide. Alice In Wonderland, another rush job, another stinker, earned £8.3m in its opening weekend in the UK, breaking records.

The novelty of 3D was a factor; and Nolan's right, this will dim. But the technology just about guarantees the industry extra loot via a 3D surcharge on every ticket. Nobody seems quite sure what this covers – the funny glasses are paid for separately – but we've paid up, hoiking UK takings up by 8% from 2009.

It has all helped 3D to spread beyond the multiplex. Sky has won approving noise from football fans for its 3D match coverage, screened in 2,000 British pubs. Around 100,000 of us have bought 3D-equipped televisions this year, and by next summer Sky expects around that number of subscribers to its 3D channel, pushed hard this Christmas with screenings of a David Attenborough nature show, as well as the film that started the fuss, Avatar. Cameron is not a fan of 3D's new ubiquity – he thinks most 3D films "kind of suck". Tom Lamont

18 Bankers still like, and get, their bonuses

Big bonuses will be paid out again for 2010. Wall Street was forecast to pay out the second-highest level of bonuses on record, by the state comptroller of New York, Thomas DiNapoli, while in the City of London a healthy bonus season was also expected.

In a world where public spending is being axed, jobs cut almost every day and wages being frozen, financiers continue to party on. Their lives have changed a bit. New European rules mean that no more than 20% of bonuses might be given in cash, with the rest in shares and spread out for a few years.

The Irish government halted the Christmas plans for bankers at Allied Irish Banks. Embattled Irish finance minister Brian Lenihan refused to hand over bailout cash to AIB if the bank went ahead with €40m (£34m) of bonus payments to 2,400 staff. So something did change – in Ireland at least. Jill Treanor

19 Craig Venter created artifical life (or not)

Earth's dwindling number of species got an unexpected boost in May when scientists announced they had created the first synthetic life form. The $40m project was led by Craig Venter, the US geneticist, and involved creating an organism that at its core had an entirely synthetic genome constructed from laboratory chemicals. "It's a living species now, part of our planet's inventory of life," said Venter, who claims such bacteria could one day be used to make biofuels, soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and even make vaccines.

However, the British biologist and Nobel prizewinner Sir John Sulston said the result was "clever and pretty" but not artificial life. "This is just an attempt to monopolise, through the patenting system, essentially all the tools for genomic manipulation," Sulston said. "These tools should be in the public domain. Monopolistic control of this kind would be bad for science, bad for consumers and bad for business, because it removes the element of competition." RMcK

20 American politics is almost broken

The founding fathers of the US were anxious to limit the power of government – hence the famous checks and balances in the constitution. In fact, the US is so checked and balanced it is a small miracle that government happens at all – which, if you think government is the source of all evil, means the constitution is doing its job. What made the US system work in the last resort was the power of reason and loyalty to a common set of core values. Both have disappeared.

Today's US government is almost completely gridlocked – and astonishingly vulnerable to vested interests. President Obama and Congress cannot get to grips with the scale of the budget deficit, nor the need to contain the threat of a new financial crisis. Corporations write the law. The public realm is hollowed out, and most public institutions, from education to the transport infrastructure, are decaying – there seems little hope of turning the tide.

Reason is close to impossible with the Tea party. And adherence to common values is disintegrating. The American centre is crumbling, and with it economic, social and political power.

plucked from Chariweb.com